1/15/2023 2 Comments Dr pester el paso txIn her summary judgment affidavit, Rennels stated that on October 7, 1993, her attorney gave notice to the hospital that she was opposing a discriminatory practice in her employment at SLA, namely that SLA was refusing to promote her to shareholder because of her gender. The contract between SLA and the hospital necessarily entailed continuous interaction between SLA and the hospital administrators. In turn, SLA contracted with the hospital to provide it with pathology services. Rennels was employed by Sierra Laboratory Associates (SLA) as a pathologist. The trial court granted the hospital's motion. The hospital also argued that because Rennels had no cause of action under the TCHRA, her derivative civil conspiracy claim must also fail. could not maintain causes of action against the hospital for violating the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (TCHRA) because the hospital was not her employer. d/b/a Sierra Medical Center (the hospital) moved for summary judgment urging that plaintiff Margaret Rennels, M.D. Finding that under the facts here the Act may apply, we reverse and remand. This case involves the application of the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act where the parties do not have a direct employer/employee relationship. 1973) have recognized a cause of action where persons have been unfairly prejudiced by discriminatory interference with their employment opportunities by a party other than their direct employer. In such a situation, numerous federal courts, relying on the well-considered opinion in Sibley Mem'l Hosp. We believe Rennels' relationship with the hospital was one in which the TCHRA may be invoked, even though the hospital did not directly employ Rennels, because it had the power to adversely affect Rennels' business opportunities in much the same manner as a direct employer, a labor union, or an employment agency. More questions? You can always contact us. Always check with your doctor before making any decisions. It may also be skewed towards procedures more common among Medicare beneficiaries than the general population.Ī lack of detection does not necessarily mean a lack of expertise, just that it was not visible within this dataset. The data is limited to Medicare beneficiaries, meaning that physicians that do not accept Medicare (<10% of all physicians) will be excluded. While this data can provide a wealth of knowledge, it comes with certain limitations. These procedures go into this section in order to help consumers make more informed choices. Using this data, we can detect when doctors perform certain procedures more frequently than similar providers. It includes aggregate information about the procedures performed by different providers. This feature uses Medicare data to determine how often a provider performs a procedure relative to other providers in their state also performing the same procedure.ĭata in this section is calculated using Medicare Physician and Other Supplier Data, which provides records of Medicare utilization throughout the United States. This section highlights the procedures that Dr.
2 Comments
3/20/2023 09:17:59 am
This is really fascinating, You’re an overly skilled blogger.
Reply
3/20/2023 09:29:37 am
The hospital also argued that because Rennels had no cause of action under the Tchra, her derivative civil conspiracy claim must also fail. could not maintain causes of action against the hospital for violating the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act, I’m so thankful for your helpful post!
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |